Collaboration models
Turnkey project
The goal is clear, the boundaries are clear, we take responsibility for the result.
The definition covers not only what to build, but also what happens when things go wrong: shared mockups for the interfaces, formal contracts for the APIs, exceptions and alternative paths spelled out. It does not force a waterfall approach: only the clear part goes into the project, the rest is handled with the other models.
This model works when the goal is defined, the scope is clear and time, budget and responsibilities are shared realistically. The aim is to remove ambiguity where there should be none left, and the work still proceeds iteratively, limited to the parts already clarified.
- When it makes sense
- Unambiguous scope, with budget and deadlines that are reasonable for both sides.
- What we guarantee
- The agreed result, at the agreed price, edge cases included.
- What we need from you
- A contact person who can make decisions, and a quick channel to clear up doubts.
- How it is measured
- Acceptance criteria written down before starting.
When to use it
When you know exactly what you want to achieve, you have defined the result in a verifiable way and you are ready to set time and budget. It is the right model when uncertainty is low and the point is to execute well, not to explore.
When to avoid it
When requirements are still vague, change often or hide ambiguities. Forcing a turnkey project in these conditions creates unrealistic expectations and conflict: the model looks solid, but it rests on unstable ground.
Not sure it is the right model for you?
The guidance survey takes three minutes, brings your situation into focus and points to the way of working that makes most sense right now. Or you can talk to an engineer to work out where to begin.